Skip all navigation and jump to content Jump to site navigation Jump to section navigation.
NASA Logo - Goddard Space Flight Center + Visit NASA.gov
Computational and Information Sciences & Technology Office banner

 

 

CISTO News
HOME
ARCHIVES

Editor
Mike Hollis

Associate Editor
Jarrett Cohen

Consultants
Lara Clemence
Jim Fischer
Jasaun Neff

Website Design
Pamela Ricks

PDF Design
DeAnna Yu

Download a PDF version of the newsletter:

+ CISTO News Winter-Spring 2008



 

ISSUE FOCUS ON HELIOPHYSICS

NCCS Support of Space Exploration: Improving Space Weather Modeling Required for Interplanetary Travel

By Jarrett Cohen and Mike Hollis

Introduction
Within the next two decades, NASA will build a new generation of vehicles to return to the Moon and eventually make humankind’s first trip to Mars. The Vision for Space Exploration is the driver for this overarching endeavor. Modeling and predicting the weather of the space environment that intrepid astronauts must traverse is a prerequisite for these journeys.

“If NASA plans to explore the Moon and Mars, reliably predicting space weather is essential,” said Tom Moore, Deputy Director of the Heliophysics Science Division at Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). “If you were mounting an expedition to Antarctica, you would ignore the weather conditions at your peril. The solar system is the same, only worse. There are all kinds of powerful things going on in it.”

Among the hazards space travelers face are potentially lethal proton radiation events that emanate from solar storms. For example, Figure 1 shows radiation events during the Apollo missions to the Moon in terms of ionizing radiation dosage measured in Roentgen Equivalent Man (REM-the deposition of about 94 ergs of energy in 1 gram of soft body tissue). The radiation events are shown as orange, green, and pink bars. As established by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for occupations in the nuclear field, the accumulative total dosage for an adult worker should not exceed 5 REM per year to be safe. Note that this limit does not nor cannot apply to astronauts! In any case, short, high-radiation events are more lethal than events of the same accumulated dosage spread out over a longer time span.


Photo of graph showing radiation dose
Figure 1: The graph shows the radiation dose to astronauts from solar events during the Apollo era missions, plotted against sunspot count. With longer-duration space flights planned as part of the Vision for Space Exploration, sporadic risks will become certain events. Figure from NASA''s The New Science of the Sun-Solar System Connection: Recommended Roadmap for Science and Technology 2005–2035.

As Figure 1 shows, the astronauts were very lucky that most of their missions did not coincide with major solar events. An August 1972 event–right between the Apollo 16 and 17 missions–would have hit an astronaut with 300 to 3,000 REM of radiation! Note that 400 to 450 REM of whole body radiation in a short period of time would result in severe radiation poisoning and a 50 percent chance of fatality within 30 days. "It is mind-boggling that they were that close," Moore said. With a Mars journey taking months in each direction, NASA must have the capability to predict dangerous events and then provide safe haven for astronauts within the spacecraft.

NASA has a fleet of spacecraft designed to observe solar phenomena and space weather (see Figure 2). Moreover, the NASA Center for Computational Sciences (NCCS) is playing a vital role in the advancement of space weather modeling, which is really just in its infancy. With the problem ultimately involving the entire solar system, "we need all the supercomputing facilities that can be marshaled towards it, and there is probably no limit to the computing capability you could use," Moore said. The CISTO News staff interviewed three GSFC researchers heavily involved in improving various aspects of space weather modeling:

  • In the near vicinity of the Sun, Joachim Schmidt investigates coronal mass ejections and their measurable effects at radio wavelengths using observations from spacecraft and ground-based telescope arrays.
  • Inside the tail of Earth's magnetosphere, Alex Klimas models the evolution and interaction of magnetic reconnection sites in the plasma sheet–phenomena that can accelerate energetic particles towards our planet.
  • Still closer to Earth, Tom Moore simulates the magnetosphere and ionosphere as they react to the solar wind and complicated solar events.
When perfected in NCCS exploratory runs, their techniques will migrate to production runs on the GSFC Space Weather Laboratory's computing cluster and improve predictions for the operational community. As they make progress, these computational explorers find that the NCCS is central to their research efforts. In the words of Moore, "We really treasure the NCCS!"


Photo of space weather modeling
Figure 2: A fleet of spacecraft observe phenomena that emerge from the Sun and cause space weather. Data from these spacecraft aid NASA scientists using the NASA Center for Computational Sciences to improve space weather modeling.


Introduction


Part I: Simulating Coronal Mass Ejections

Part II: Focusing on Magnetic Reconnection

Part III: Getting the Ionosphere Model Right

Epilogue


http://www.nccs.nasa.gov
http:/hsd.gsfc.nasa.gov
http://nasascience.nasa.gov/heliophysics/mission_list

 
USAGov logo + Privacy Policy and Important Notices
+ Sciences and Exploration Directorate
+ CISTO
NASA Curator: Pamela Ricks
NASA Official: Phil Webster, CISTO Chief
Last Updated: Friday, 02-May-2008 08:13:30 EDT